I didn’t actually get to read my copy of The Lady while I was in hospital, in fact I didn’t get to read anything at all. This was mainly thanks to my post-op brain’s refusal to comply with the usual everyday instructions I tend to bombard it with, like “concentrate” or “focus” or “turn the sodding page ffs!” No, tragically instead of reading anything from the pile of books and magazines I’d lugged in with me to help occupy my time while the glue was busy drying on the Eurofighter, I was reduced to forking out £7.00 for 3 days use of a bedside entertainment unit. This enabled me to watch more telly in a few short hours than I’ve managed to watch in total in the last couple of years. Then I came home on Thursday morning and watched a whole load more.
But yesterday I decided it was time to take the big, all-important step back to normality (or at least what passes for it in my world) and my real life. And so I switched the telly off.
And then I read The Lady.
And oh my word, what a rare old pile of shite it is.
I’ll pass over the Independent Schools Supplement and the classified ads (although I can’t promise I’ll never make mention in future of the “perfect 2 bedroom retirement home” being advertised in there as “a snip at £375,000“, or all the situations vacant slots for housekeepers and nannies, like this one for example: “Full-time Daily Housekeeper. Responsible for all aspects of 6-storey house. Cleaning, grocery shopping, laundry, ironing, errands, some cooking. Driver required. Good English. Management of part time cleaner. Non smoker. References essential.) and focus instead on two of this week’s main features: Fay Weldon on socks and sex, and Laura Barber’s article on the Return of the Lady.
Now Weldon’s already come in for some well-deserved stick following an interview she did with Bryony Gordon of the Telegraph, in which the so-called icon of feminism is quoted as saying:
“There are women at work and there’s mating behaviour and women get them confused. At work, gender should not come into it. Women are right to refuse to make the coffee, but when you get home I’m afraid you have to make the coffee. It’s such a waste of time trying to tell your husband to pick up the socks or clean the loo. It’s much easier just to do it yourself.”
Well in her Lady interview with Paul Blezard, Weldon digs the hole a little bit deeper:
“It’s true and I mean it, not least in order to preserve domestic peace. I had no idea it would create such a fuss. The people who have got so exercised by it all are, I think, being totally unrealistic. Also, when you’re being interviewed you just chat on about the things that are on your mind and such things pop out. I mean, I was speaking as the mother of four sons. My husband (poet Nick Fox) is very peeved about that quote, but I do mean it, it just is easier to do it yourself.”
Further on in the interview:
“I ask her how she would respond to those who say she has let feminism down. “Well, I didn’t even know I was a feminist until I read it on the back of one of my books. I thought I was writing novels about what I saw and thought; I certainly wasn’t writing intentional propaganda. When I got a job as an advertising copywriter, I was expected to make coffee as much as come up with copy. I soon noticed it was the women who did the work while the men went out to lunch and talked about their wives’ chests. It just seemed interesting. Wrong, of course, but interesting also and I wanted to point that out.”
I have to say I’m not surprised to hear the woman who argued that rape should be reduced to a lesser charge of aggravated assault on the grounds that it “actually isn’t the worst thing that can happen to a woman if you’re safe, alive and unmarked after the event” and who advised women to fake orgasms, admit to knowing fuck all about feminism; I’m only surprised that it’s taken her this long to do so. Oh yes, and surprised by how quickly Weldon manages to contradict herself. Here she is in the Guardian humming a completely different tune only a month ago for instance:
Did she feel part of the feminist movement? “Inevitably, but I never wrote propaganda because it all seemed so evident. It became obvious that you had to be a feminist because it was such a ridiculous state of affairs.”
So it was obvious she had to be a feminist and part of the movement, and yet she didn’t know she was a feminist until she read it on the back of one of her books. Confused? Yes indeed, sadly I do believe she is.
But anyway, enough about Weldon and her increasingly bizarre pronouncements on feminism. England’s First and Finest Weekly Magazine presents us with a far more complex issue to debate than whose job it should be to pick up the socks and put down the toilet seat, which is: do ladies still exist?
Laura Barber contends that even though the lady became a dying breed in 1958 when the last debutantes were presented at the palace, “there are signs that the post-feminist lady is finally stepping out of the parlour and flexing her muscles.” As evidence for this we apparently only have to look at Michelle Obama, Sarah Brown, Samantha Cameron and Joanna Lumley, women who remain gracious in their performance of public duties and who, it is implied, unlike Madonna or Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, aren’t just trying to look the part, for they have the fundamental character that goes with it.
“Today’s ‘lady’ is intellectual and well-mannered without being snobbish” says Rachel Johnson, the magazine’s new editor, “she enjoys travelling, reading, and gardening; she’s the type of woman who could start her own business or get involved in local projects.” Which all sounds fair enough; after all, that description could probably apply to any one of us, so it’s a shame she then has to spoil it by providing this ridiculous set of rules:
RJ’s Top 10 Rules for a Lady
- Put others first
- Treat everyone the same but accord those older and higher-ranked (ie your consultant) with extra respect
- Always give bad news face to face, never by text or email, and look your victim in the eye
- Do not noodle (?) on your mobile or idly flick through the paper while anyone, especially your mother, is talking to you.
- Do not wear underwear as outerwear, or no underwear at all
- When someone is talking to you, actually listen
- Stand up or at least pitch forwards in your chair when an older woman enters the room
- Call an older woman “Mrs Proops” until she invites you to call her “Marjorie” – and never before
- Do not hold loud personal conversations in public places
- However bad things are, a lady always stands up straight and holds her head up high
Yep, I can really see myself getting into that. Standing up whenever an older woman walks into the room, and calling any woman I don’t know Mrs sodding Proops. Not.
Barber’s conclusion seems to be that much like fun feminism, where any woman can declare herself and her actions to be feminist no matter what simply by virtue of the fact that she as an empowerfulled woman has chosen freely to do whatever it is, any woman can also be a lady. It’s not about class or breeding or wealth any more, “the lady is a rather more flexible, inventive, and surprising figure than the rigid stereotypes have allowed.”
Says Barber:
“We are living in an era when female success no longer requires cookie-cutter conformity to some narrow ideal of femininity, with a cut-glass accent and a set of opinions bland enough to pass around the canapés. But nor should expressing your individuality and promoting your own interests necessitate backstabbing, or aping male bravado. Rather than having been ‘finished’ in the old sense, it seems to me that this generation of girls are only just beginning to work out what being a lady might mean – and this time, with luck, it’ll be on their terms.”
This time, with luck, girls will realise what outdated nonsense this all is. And then they’ll get on with their lives without giving tired old sexist gender rules so much as a second thought.
As Jemima Lewis once said in her classic piece on this subject:
Woman is a straightforward word, a description of gender only lightly dusted with overtones of maturity and earthiness. Lady, on the other hand, is saturated with daintiness: it suggests coy glances and batting eyelashes, pencil skirts, pinnies, manicures, tiny feet, dinner on the table and not a hair out of place. It means never burping, snorting with laughter or buying a round.
I’ll second that. Now sing it Helen:
Welcome home, Cath.
All these diversionary tactics won’t work, though. WE WANT TO SEE THAT EUROFIGHTER!
You have been missed, though it was nice to get that report that you’re OK. Poor Gregory Carlin’s been so bored he had to resort to commenting all over my blog, so I might have to start a new one.
Funny thing, etiquette. Whatever her surname or marital status might be, she MUST be referred to as “Mrs Proops” at all times. Only when the codeword “Marjorie” has been uttered may you address her by her actual name. I assume older men must be called “Mr. Paulson” until they invite you to call them “Robert”.
Winking is optional, but recommended.
Glad to see that you’re getting back to normal and enjoyed the magazine! 🙂
You kinda knew it was going to be a pile of old shite though, just from the title… own up! And the editor is Rachel sister of Boris… bit of a giveaway in itself, I’d a thought. Mind you… Top rant nonetheless…
Please note on rule ten:
“10. However bad things are, a lady always stands up straight and holds her head up high”
…if things are so bad that you’ve actually got a broken neck, this rule ceases to apply!
You beat me to it Alex.
So I gather you won’t be taking out a subscription then Cath? Not even when you’re next looking for a housekeeper? I wouldn’t worry anyway, since you’ll undergo gender reassignment when you’ve made the Eurofighter.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/5304780.stm
Thanks for that link, Polly.
My uncle, God bless his soul, actually had the job of taking the original aircraft designs for the Lancaster, Spitfire etc and ploughing away as a draughtsman, scaling them down for the Airfix kits, at a firm in or around Maidstone in Kent.
Yep, I knew it would be shite Kiz, but in my defence I didn’t actually buy the magazine, t’was a gift from my so-called friends…
And the editor is the sister of Boris, and the bloke who wrote the cover article about how the NHS saved his life is the father of Boris. Nepotism eh? How would this country function without it?
Great link Polly, but aren’t I halfway there with the gender reassignment, what with having no uterus or cervix anymore……
Now there’s a topic for discussion. What makes a woman a woman?
Judith Butler already did it Cath. The only thing you need to do is to work out what she’s on about.
But there’s a bit of a bun fight going on elsewhere needless to say.
http://jasperswardrobe.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/you-degender-me-i-degender-you/
Yes, Polly is right, Cath, you must have a MAN’s bRaiN cos you made that Eurofigher *snorts*. Come on, admit it, you is a manz!
Meh, course The Lady is a pile of nepotistic crap.
But, most of those rules didn’t sound that unreasonable to me, for all people mind you, not just women. OK, clearly 1 is rubbish (do men ever put anyone first?), 2 is hierarchical crap, 7 and 10 are ableist crap, but… the others sort of made sense to me.
Well, 8 sort of does. I mean it sounds stuffy, but at the same time, it’s polite and always safe. At work I tend to address people by title + surname until they indicate otherwise.
Which is 5.5/ 10.
Not that I ever intend to read The Lady, or the Telegraph, or am defending them.
And dear Fay Weldon – I read that Guardian piece. She’s certainly confused.
I’m still confused by .5
Who wears underwear as outerwear apart from Superman?
Welcome back, Cath. This is precisely the kind of blogpost that I needed to read. Hooray for you!
Ha, true. OK, I suppose that one is slut-shaming crap.
Oh and I meant to say, no-one is getting called Mrs by me. It’s Ms all the way. Even my not-so-enlightened workplace accepts that, kinda.
Meh, I think that’s 3 left I agree with.
I was on annual leave today and thus missed the chance of making small talk with a baroness. Probably a good thing, since I have no idea how you’re meant to address a baroness.
And in gendered ways to pass your time news, I’ve done quite a bit of ironing.
Madonna, Cath.
Polly – By title I meant Mr or Ms – or maybe Dr etc.
I would have no idea either. I wasn’t defending the class system or The Lady or…
Oh and the ironing comment was kinda a…joke…as in something I did purely to avoid studying. If that was a reference to my comment.
My comment on the other thread. Since Laurelin mentioned cleaning, also a gendered pastime.
Honestly BFW, I’m not making any reference to any comments you’ve made, it’s just coincidence I had a running joke about ironing on my now departed blog. I’m having arguments with enough people on t’internetz today. (so unlike me, I know).
Madonna and Lady Gaga… and John Major came close I suppose… according to Steve Bell anyways..
Steve Bell’s John Major was the first to spring to my mind.
But then, John Major will never be a lady.
Unlike his famous predecessor.
Edward Heath.
The Lady is based in Covent Garden, and must admit that everytime I pass the building I have to stop and stare….. and curse the damn place!
Oh, and they have editions from the olden times in the window… Niiiccce!
Actually the style of the building matches the politics of the place…..
I think if you discard Superman, who isn’t real, Madonna did start the underwear as outerwear trend. Lady Gaga is the new Madonna, let’s face it.
We also have to face the fact that there are now no original members left in the Sugababes, information I am indebted to all major UK news media for. Including the Guardian and BBC news bulletins.
Meanwhile, in Darfur….
“You have been missed, though it was nice to get that report that you’re OK. Poor Gregory Carlin’s been so bored he had to resort to commenting all over my blog, so I might have to start a new one”
Stephen
The more blogs you have the better, it can only help somebody.
I thought you would be pleased with me, I’ve just negated the first ever sex trafficking conviction at a magistrates court, and two more trials are looking very iffy.
I am surprised the pimp union (the GMB) hasn’t offered honorary membership.
“All these diversionary tactics won’t work, though. WE WANT TO SEE THAT EUROFIGHTER!”
ffs, the wings had to be part assembled in Italy, sent to Germany, before Cath had a chance to glue them on.
Gregory
Gregory – yes, I have looked at this case since your comments (or as much as I can find on the web). It does seem very odd.
We should really be using my blog rather than hijacking Cath’s posting, I think, but if anyone there’s interested it seems the first Northern Ireland sex trafficking conviction’s about to be reversed. The strange thing is that this seems to be at the instigation of the prosecuting authorities rather than the defence (which pleaded guilty).
Maybe we could continue this where Gregory left it, in the comments column of my January 16 posting here:
http://stephenpaterson.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/human-trafficking-whats-human-trafficking/#comment-94
But what about the Sugababes Stephen?
Sadly, Polly, I had never heard of them before this thread. Or, if I had, the information passed in one ear and out the other. For those of us that grew up in Liverpool at the time of the Beatles, I’m afraid, pop culture’s just been one long downwards journey.
I have discovered the web site
http://www.sugababes.com/home.php
Sadly, or happily, my audio’s not working.
Forget the bloody Sugababes, what about Chas n Dave!
Here’s someone who can help you get better, Cath – and he doesn’t read those magazines!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRA8vC23bl0
Indeed Cath, I have talked of little else but Chas and Dave today. And the Male had some truly amazing Chas and Dave facts. The most amazing of which (and this has to be the bestest pub quiz question ever) is that Chas and Dave actually appear on Eminem’s *my name is* because they are playing on a Labi Siffre track he sampled.
I think we have to give serious thought though to whether we’re really post feminist enough to now consider Chas and Dave were just being ironic following the “Rabbit, rabbit” controversry
OMG! Cath, Polly, and Chas and Dave (and perhaps rabbits) apart, although occassionally we may have our bitter ( but honest) differences, I can say that from time to time, Cath has somehow manufactured here a blog that makes me smile! And indeed, I hope, learn…
“And so I switched the telly off”
Really? Not sure I believe that at all. Its obviously a severe and enduring side effect of the anaesthetic that is making you watch the X Factor. (your twitters confirm you are watching it)
I am hoping that as you recover from your surgery you will also get over your need to watch the X Factor.
Well okay, I kind of switched it off. No more daytime TV, no more Cash in the Attic, Bargain Hunters and so on.
But turn off the X Factor? You’re kidding, right?