Comments on: Big man

By: ExposingYvetteDoll

ExposingYvetteDoll — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:08:12 +0000

You’d know all about ‘schoolgirls and upskirt voyeurism’ of course, Yvette Doll/Greg Carlin, as you seem to spend a lot of time getting involved in legal cases wanting to uphold schoolgirls wearing skirts over trousers – why so interested I wonder?

http://broadstoneschoolequality.blogspot.com/2005/07/skirt-ban-uk-school-forcing-unisex.html

By: Yvette Doll

Yvette Doll — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:36:31 +0000

“and we can(maybe)work together on trying to help change those attitudes.”

Cath

Get out of here

Your prob, is you don’t know how to win.

if thy don’t agree to abolition, they’re on the other side, and there is nothing to talk about.

With them, it is not a debate.

Yvette

By: Yvette Doll

Yvette Doll — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:15:41 +0000

“I have little doubt that she didn’t consent to the picture from the outset, thus she did not consent to it being used in this case either.”

The standard pro-porn theory of consent also works for sex with animals.

If ASACP, ACLU and the Free speech Coalition, keep up the bad work, who is going to know?

It is a moral argument, and the porn industry is only one industry, the same ASACP types, fall over themselves to meet their ‘more extreme’ animal cousins.

We now have ASACP bannered web-sites with eight year old British schoolgirls, upskirt voyeurism

ASACP hit Europe like the porn Stasi, they made friends, with anybody and anything that would help the porn industry, in the USA.

NSPCC, NCIS, when it comes to the crunch, the kiddie charities wanna sit next to VISA and the Credit Cards with anybody else sitting there

There were no feminists, because feminism is not important enough to get an invite.

Brit fems are irrelevant.

Yvette Doll

By: Laurelin

Laurelin — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:42:30 +0000

Wow, Susan. Lavalamp only gets to speak so long as she says what you want. Love the way you get to dictate what sex workers are allowed to think. You really are a piece of work!

By: Polly Styrene

Polly Styrene — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:49:59 +0000

Are you a sex worker Susan, just out of interest? YOu might have said so upthread, but life is short, and I’m unravelling a jumper at the mo to reuse the wool.

By: lavalamp

lavalamp — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:47:05 +0000

Then you shouldn’t have any conflict with supporting the right of sex workers [...]

Nobody gets to tell me what I ‘should’ do or feel about sex work — now just get to fuck. You are a fucking embarrassment to sex work advocacy.

By: Susan

Susan — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:36:55 +0000

Susan – I was a sex worker for many years.>>>

Then you shouldn’t have any conflict with supporting the right of sex workers to work in a safe and decriminalized environment, and to not focus on “pimps” and “punters” as an excuse to ignore or distract away from that right. The more power a sex worker has, the less power a pimp has.

By: lavalamp

lavalamp — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:49:35 +0000

Of course, lavalamp, the idea that sex workers can decide things for themselves and be in control of their own lives would be “bizarre” to you.

Susan – I was a sex worker for many years. Ask around, lots of radical feminists are ex sex industry.

By: Susan

Susan — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:43:40 +0000

Of course, lavalamp, the idea that sex workers can decide things for themselves and be in control of their own lives would be “bizarre” to you.

By: Susan

Susan — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:40:43 +0000

>>>I suggest that you shut up and learn something before making a fool of both yourself and the concerns of a focus, which you proclaim – so loudly to be in support of.>>>

Oooooooh, name calling. Now I know I’m right.