Gregory: you are no Feminist, but just another creepy man.

Recently it has been hugely interesting.

That’s the difference between me and Douglas Fox, the only thing I’ve ever pimped is an art gallery.

What you have to understand, is that CEDAW precludes dress codes relative to:

“personal safety: girls may be able to run faster in trousers than a skirt and they may be less vulnerable to indecent assault”

http://83.137.212.42/sitearchive/eoc/Default4474.html?page=15370&theme=print

You see, that is a no no

Which brings me to Vera Baird, could it be possible a school on her patch is doing it?

I am so glad nu-labor is getting buried at the next election.

Hopefully we will be short a few of the women, who were a dead loss to CEDAW.

“Are you still keeping up this ‘Yvette Doll” psuedonym, Mr Carlin?”

There are people paying a thousand bucks a pop for my ‘gallery’ records.

So the answer is definitely yes.

Gregory

I certainly attended meetings there. I did almost a hundred records, I can’t possibly remember them all.

I think the Lib Dems could have done better than Eno. By the way the Liberal Democrats are aware of why Jacqui can’t help the IUSW out.

“Seems odd to me, somebody who usually represents an Irish organisation against something so important as sex trafficking would get so involved in a battle at an English school over whether girls wear trousers or skirts?”

The DfeS were negotiating with the EOC about fixing ‘false allegations’ by banning skirts. If you do an FOI on the topic, you could strike lucky.

HRW had the same issue with MDOC.

Yvette

http://www.hrw.org/en/news/1999/06/10/letter-attorney-general-janet-reno

Fifth, the settlement agreement imposes a dress code on the women inmates. The imposition of a dress code sends the wrong message to the corrections staff. It effectively shifts the blame for sexual harassment, sexual abuse, and invasions of privacy from the offending corrections staff to the women. The women’s rights movement has worked for decades to dispel the myth that women “provoke” attacks or “ask for it” by dressing in ways which are perceived as “immodest.” By imposing a dress code on the women, the settlement not only places the blame squarely on the women, but it gives the corrections officers another means to punish and harass the women.

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.irish/browse_thread/thread/f06ad3b80f0273a1

http://archive.thisisdorset.net/2005/7/9/109328.html

Skimpy schoolgirl skirt ban – News – Manchester Evening News
6 May 2007 … Skimpy schoolgirl skirt ban. Exclusive Yakub Qureshi 1/ 6/2007. SKIRTS are being banned by a high school because girls are wearing them too …
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1008/1008182_skimpy_ schoolgirl_skirt_ban.html – 37k – Cached – Similar pages -

That looks like 15K of work to get it reversed. All ban schools will have a history of disputed touchie feelie stuff.

It never fails

Yvette

Because to do so would be tantamount to two things:

1)admitting that teachers who sexually abuse their pupils do so because they were “led on” and “just couldn’t help themselves” – which is similar to the kind of rubbish Dr Cowling spouts about men ‘not being automatons’.

2)It says that you can’t sexually assualt a woman/girl who is wearing trousers. Which is nonsense on a ten foot pole.

Try looking at the schoolgirl skirt bans. The EOC agreed to sit at a table and talk about protecting teachers from ‘false allegations’. Feminism has allowed the NASUWT to put a road block on real reform of *all* sex crime.

“personal safety: girls may be able to run faster in trousers than a skirt and they may be less vulnerable to indecent assault”

http://83.137.212.42/sitearchive/eoc/Default4474.html?page=15370&theme=print

Until you sort out your teachers, you have nothing but aimless BS ahead of you. Is is today it cecomes completely impossible to track educator misconduct stats? Your country is a disgrace to civilization.

Half of Africa has higher standards. When feminism turned a blind eye to sex offenders working in schools you were telling the govt. sex offending was no big deal.

You don’t need to be in pimp that ersatz feminism (feminist fightback) to groove to that undeniable logic.

You have to help yourselves.

Yvette