Comments on: The great IUSW con

By: Roxy

Roxy — Sun, 22 May 2011 16:42:29 +0000

I am very curious to see the C4 DOC ‘ The Escort Agency’ from 2006, would anybody know when i can find it online,or point me in the right direction of getting hold of a copy??
Many thanks,
Roxy Red

By: Brian Cooper

Brian Cooper — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:13:30 +0000

Thanks for the nice post.

Any idea why the “legalization” argument has been taken up by those who have a sincere interest in women’s rights? I’m not talking about brotel-owners joining the IUSW, I’m talking about people who tell me that “real feminists know that the best thing for prostitutes is being regulated.”

My Dad, of course, could tell me that it’s because “the liberals are always going to try to find a new way to be shocking,” but I’m looking for a more complicated answer. (There is a more complicated answer, right?)

By: Sex “Positive” Prostitutes’ Rights Movement Leaders Are Also Transphobic « VALERIE SPEAKS

Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:18:05 +0000

[...] 9, 2009 · No Comments Hey, look at the BROTHEL OWNER named Douglas Fox who claims to be leading a movement for the “liberation of sex [...]

By: Yvette

Yvette — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:45:53 +0000

“The same document also clearly asks that member states understand the difference between coercive pimping and consensual management of sex businesses where sex workers freely choose to operate from for reasons of security and mutual support. ”

He got past Amnesty’s pimp radar,

and they’ve lost much of their rep for baiting Cardinal Pujats, about Riga. Which when the truth emerged had the pro-gays with gun enabled private ‘guards’, paramilitary gays!

I don’t think Amnesty planned on that news reaching the west.

And then…. it turns out they had a pimp as a mover and shaker of motions, and resolutions.

“the difference between coercive pimping and consensual management”

And a wee bit of a self-interest profit wagon, Amnesty were *hugely* damaged by Douglas Fox.

AIUK had a pimp as a delegate!

By: Gregory

Gregory — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:35:15 +0000

there has always been a dispensation in Christendom for the Jew with money, or the aesthete. Without gay people, the paint would be peeling off many a work of art,

In Belfast for example it was the gays encouraged by Amnesty who targeted the Catholics. Catholics supported the gays being given free money, but they were expected to behave themselves.

If we won’t tolerate the Orange Order with an effigy of the Pope, why tolerate baiting parades by any anti-Catholic groupings? When in Rome, learn how to behave.

As it happens, gay brothels I simply had to ignore, until Douglas Fox that is, now with Amnesty off my back, I’m closing the entire heap in Ireland.

It was reverse homophobia, they had completely free pass from anti-prostitution activism.

They’ve lost that for good and they can thank Douglas Fox. The IUSW goal of consultative status with Jacqui Smith MP was also gainsayed by Douglas Fox.

He wasn’t much use was he?

Gregory

By: peter schevt

peter schevt — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:41:45 +0000

people in glass houses should’nt throw stones!
the prohibition lobby has anti-abortionists and homophobes in its midst,strange bedfellows indeed!
the iraq war has led to forced prostitution,does the anti-prostitution gang care? of course not,who voted for the iraq war?
harriet harman et al

By: Yvette

Yvette — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:17:48 +0000

I think Redcar is getting a visit, about child sex trafficking.

That is Vera Baird’s home turf. It is a follow-up to the PtP thing. I think the last visit had 3,000 pedophiles, tracked by the forces of light and they were all in the NE area, is that a dangerous place or what?

It is not exactly that far from the global centre of

“For lots of women, the lure of easy money must be strong and when John placed an advert in a Jobcentre, this struck him forcefully. “Within a seven day period we had 4,000 applications – everything from a 68-year-old housewife to a priest,”‘

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/866713.we_dont_sell_sex_for_a_living/

Priests asking to be prostitutes.

Yvette

By: Feminist Fightback Responds to Cath Elliot : x:talk

Feminist Fightback Responds to Cath Elliot : x:talk — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:22:28 +0000

[...] been mentioned several times in Cath Elliot’s ‘The Great IUSW Con’, Feminist Fightback would like to reply to the accusations levelled at both the IUSW and [...]

By: Gregory

Gregory — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:14:35 +0000

“Not posting as your alter-ego ‘Yvette Doll’ today, Mr Carlin?”

If you don’t understand that split city, that Berlin thing, then you are not going to understand why DDR beer tasted better. I got the office in Covent Garden, and Yvette got the B & W version of Berlin. It was a change from Haight Asbury.

“The right to walk the streets for what ever reason with the expectation of not being subjected to any violence, (including but not limited to the not being subjected to the violence of arrest prostitution), is an inherent human right.”

Schoolgirls can’t walk about Soho can they? That’s real schoolgirls by the way.

Gregory

By: In which I respond to the response « Too Much To Say For Myself

In which I respond to the response « Too Much To Say For Myself — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:46:12 +0000

[...] long and hard about whether or not to respond to Feminist Fightback’s post on my piece about Douglas Fox and the IUSW, because to be honest I’m not convinced that this debate is getting any of us anywhere; but [...]