Too Much To Say For Myself

In praise of the Daily Mail……

November 29, 2009 · 5 Comments

A bizarre title for me I know, and one I never thought I’d find myself writing, but credit where it’s due and all that.

I have to admit I’ve always been a bit of a Bel Mooney fan, but this is probably one of the best responses by an advice columnist I’ve ever had the pleasure of reading.

To a woman who writes in asking for help on how to understand her racist abusive husband, a husband who, four years on, still refuses to have any contact with his own granddaughter on the grounds that she’s of mixed race,  Mooney says:

You are asking me an impossible question, I’m afraid. To be blunt, nothing in the world could make me even begin to understand his behaviour (especially since his own parents are not racists) and my primitive instinct is that I’d like to shoot him.

Yes, personally. Had the little girl just been born I might try to read his disgraceful attitude as a shock response. But four years on?

Let’s be very clear about one thing. Having views about the issue of Britain’s borders and/or judging that immigration policies of recent years have not been wise is a very different thing from rejecting a four-year-old child because of the colour of her skin.

People cry ‘racism’ too easily nowadays, which serves to detract from the terrible gravity of the real, gut prejudice your husband displays, described in wrenching detail in your longer letter.

The man is a monster and, unfortunately, the world is full of people like him – responsible for the evil of the Holocaust, of Rwanda, of Kosovo, of Darfur, and of countless other seething, poisonous cauldrons of hatred since time began.

I’m afraid my sincere intention is not to help you understand this man, but to urge you to have the courage to leave him alone, to hate all by himself.

To that end, I’m going to do something unusual on this page, which is to ask the question, ‘Why do so many women accept being helplessly trapped with appalling men?’ And answer it, in effect, over two weeks.

I want you to hold what I say in your mind, and read next week’s letter as a continuation. The issue comes up frequently, but never before have I received two letters that I found so shocking and frustrating in equal measure, as yours and next week’s.

It’s vital for people to understand how many women fall into a state of terrified acceptance when ill-treated by their husbands, believing in their hearts that they deserve what’s happening.

Ground down over years, they believe the verbal abuse and, often, accept physical abuse too, because they feel worthless.

If a woman miraculously finds the strength to break the cycle in order to protect her children (and mercifully it does happen), she is obeying a deeper instinct, the protective mother defeating the abject woman at last.

This is no place for an analysis of domestic violence. What I want you to understand is that you are suffering from a version of the same, and it is time you rebelled.

This is the moment to be a mother and grandmother first of all. You say you’ve thought of leaving this apology for a husband and father. Why can you not do so?

You describe this man as your ‘carer’, but I beg you not to use such an honourable term. He does not care for you; he has no interest in your feelings, your welfare, but he does everything to make you unhappy.

I feel very sorry for your physical condition, yet since you have travelled alone to see your granddaughter, I have to assume you have some mobility. You also have three grown-up sons – and I believe it’s time they all looked after the woman who gave them life. Ask them for help.

At 55, you have (God willing) many years of life ahead of you – years in which you could read to your granddaughter, help her make Christmas cards and presents for her mum and dad, play games with her when they are busy, watch her grow.

You have to choose between that happiness and accepting your prison. And it is a choice, Rosemary. It’s not easy, but you have to act.

Tell this son that you would like to move near him. He must cease his futile efforts to talk his father round, and focus on his mother.

Ask him to work with your older sons to find you accommodation and move your belongings. I assume you have benefits; the Citizens Advice Bureau where he lives should be able to help.

His partner’s family may have suggestions – and will be all the more welcoming to you because of your principled courage and love.

You say you can’t go on like this. Then – listen! – don’t.

Spot on! Well okay, apart from the annoying bit about immigration policies and people crying racism too easily these days. Apart from those bits then, what a breath of fresh air this is, especially in comparison to the kind of drivel Pamela Stephenson Connolly or Tracey Cox regularly come out with. They’d have probably tried to convince the poor woman to have sex with the bloke or something, which appears to be their cure-all for any and all dysfunctional relationships, but not Mooney, oh no.

Basically her advice boils down to: The man’s a bastard, now get the fuck out of there Rosemary.

I couldn’t have put it better myself.

→ 5 CommentsCategories: campaigning · fear · feminism · misogyny · racist shits · violence against women

Days like these

November 25, 2009 · 73 Comments

I was going to write a big long piece today about it being the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women. I was going to write about what an important day this is, and about how we marched again on Saturday night to Reclaim the Night and called for an end to violence against women and girls. I was going to write about how the blogger Noble Savage had been sexually assaulted during the march, and about the candlelit vigil tonight in Trafalgar Square that’s been called in remembrance of all women who have been murdered and affected by male violence. And I was going to write about the government’s new strategy, announced today, on ending violence against women:  Together We Can End Violence against Women and Girls

And then my daughter rang me, and told me about how she’d been physically assaulted last night. My daughter rang me and told me about the man who suddenly came from nowhere while she was busy working away in a public library: about the man who grabbed her by the throat, headbutted her, flung her on the floor, and chased after her once she’d managed to struggle free. She told me about how he’d chased her and tried to get behind the library counter where she’d run to for safety, and about how other library staff had had to restrain him. This man. This man she’s never met before. This man she doesn’t even know.

And while she was telling me all this I know I made all the right noises and said all the right things. I know that my voice didn’t catch in my throat the way it has been doing ever since. I know that I checked with her, again and again, that she was really as all right as she said she was. And I told her I was so so glad she hadn’t been seriously hurt. And I told her of course I understood now why she hadn’t phoned last night to wish her dad a happy birthday. And I told her that I loved her.

And then I put the phone down.

And then I cried.

Because do you know what? It wasn’t meant to be like this.

We were supposed to build a better world for our daughters. A safer world. A nicer world. For fuck’s sake we were supposed to change the world, so that when our daughters stepped out into it they wouldn’t have to be afraid. They wouldn’t have to know the fear that so many of us have known.

We were supposed to stop the rape and the murders and the sexual assaults and the physical assaults and the forced marriages and the sexual exploitation and the domestic violence and the FGM and the so-called honour crimes. We were supposed to make it right for all the women and girls who came after us.

On days like these, it really does come home to me, literally, just how badly we’ve failed.

On days like these, all I can say is, I’m sorry.

→ 73 CommentsCategories: angry? what me? · campaigning · fear · feminism · libraries · me · misogyny · parenting · rape · violence against women

I must be a humourless femnazi….

November 21, 2009 · 33 Comments

Trigger Warning

….because I really don’t see anything funny about these t shirts:

“Will buy drinks for sex” t shirt on sale now in the latest Joe Brown’s catalogue (hat-tip to Polly)

Keep reading →

→ 33 CommentsCategories: FFS! · angry? what me? · feminism · misogyny · rape · violence against women · what? · you really couldn't make this shit up

Plastic surgery should fix that

November 19, 2009 · 17 Comments

Having recently undergone some abdominal surgery, I was quite naturally drawn in by the headline of this article that appeared in the online version of the Mail a few weeks ago:

How to stop yourself from being scarred for life after an operation

Just to be clear, it’s not that I’m particularly bothered about having a shiny new six inch scar across my bikini line. After all, I’ve had 4 children and a previous gall bladder op, all of which have left their mark, so it’s been a good few years since I felt the urge to actually don a bikini or parade around in a crop top with my belly exposed to all and sundry anyway. But I saw that headline and thought it might be worth reading on to see if the Mail had any decent tips on how to treat new scars, or to see if they had any advice to offer on how I could prevent myself being HIDEOUSLY DISFIGURED FOR LIFE!

So I clicked on the link.

And now I can’t decide if the Mail picture editors are completely fucking stupid, or if they’re simply painfully unaware of just how offensive they’re capable of being.

Why?

Because people with scars are obviously so HIDEOUSLY DISFIGURED FOR LIFE! that the Mail couldn’t even bring itself to illustrate the piece with an actual picture of one.

Oh no. Not for the Mail any pictures of real people with real scars. Real people with real scars are too scary and too HIDEOUSLY DISFIGURED FOR LIFE! for the Mail. So they chose instead the next best thing. They chose instead the image of a plastic doll. And not just any plastic doll I hasten to add. But Action fucking Man!

Keep reading →

→ 17 CommentsCategories: Daily Mail shite · FFS! · angry? what me? · cynical? what me? · health · me · the world's gone mad · what? · you really couldn't make this shit up

A different take on Page 3

November 17, 2009 · 6 Comments

I’m not going to add too much to what’s already been said about the 40th anniversary of the Sun (I was going to put newspaper at the end there, but, well, it’s not one really is it, so I won’t). Suffice to say, I don’t think 40 years of Page 3 sexist demeaning shite is anything worth celebrating or even acknowledging unless it’s in a head in hands “OMFG have we really not moved on from this crap yet!” kind of way. However, I was interested to see Tim Ireland’s take on the issue of Page 3 ‘girls’, and I think his post warrants some attention in the feminist blogosphere rather than just passing us by unnoticed in the more male dominated so-called political blogosphere, or blokosphere. (And a note to whoever’s responsible for the Wikio blog categorisations – feminism is politics, so please please please stop putting feminist blogs under the “general” blog heading)

Anyway, click here to watch Tim’s video, or alternatively you can see it by clicking on my shiny new vodpod widget in the side bar.

And here’s the text of the A4 insert Tim and others would like to see left inside copies of the Scum:

FREE TITS

Since 2003, the Page 3 feature in The Sun has carried an item called ‘News in Briefs’ instead of the usual pun-filled caption of days of yore.

Even the title itself is a lie; this ‘news’ item rarely carries news, and instead carries an editorial/opinion (an important distinction to make, especially when dealing with media owner Rupert Murdoch, the father of FOX News).

We are not saying that a young woman with her tits out is not allowed to have an opinion; far from it. We are instead asking, if Page 3 is as ‘empowering’ as some people claim, then why aren’t these women allowed to choose which issue(s) they discuss and/or express their own opinion about that when appearing on Page 3?

At present, they are clearly often (if not always) compelled to echo/repeat the opinions of Rupert Murdoch, Rebekah Wade, Dominic Mohan, Graham Dudman, or whoever else is calling the shots that day. This is not empowerment; rather, it is exploitation.

We challenge The Sun to allow Page 3 girls to use their paid appearance(s) in that tabloid as a personal/political platform, just as they do for columnists such as Jeremy Clarkson, Jon Gaunt, Lorraine Kelly and Jane Moore.

If there is to be editorial content on Page 3, then it should be clearly labelled as opinion (not news) and it should always be the heartfelt, unprompted opinion of the woman whose name, face and tits are being used to sell the idea. End of.

Any standard less than this exploits these women and cheats the readers.

Now obviously I don’t entirely agree with the approach Tim’s taken, in that personally, as a feminist, I’d prefer to see Page 3 ‘girls’ consigned to history, or failing that, as per the request of this Number 10 petition, I’d like to see the Sun and the Sport, along with Lads Mags like Nuts and Zoo, regulated and put on the top shelves in newsagents along with all the other porn. But just because Tim’s isn’t exactly what I’d regard as being a particularly feminist approach to a now 40 year old problem, that doesn’t mean I also think it’s one that’s entirely without merit, or that I think it should be dismissed out of hand because of its lack of feminist analysis.

Keep reading →

→ 6 CommentsCategories: a bit of politics · blogging · campaigning · feminism · misogyny · porn · sex industry · the Internet